Coal Energy

Coal Energy

What defines an American more than the banjo and the blues? My answer is simply, Coal Energy. It has been since the revolutionary wars. And has always been a consistent energy source for Americas development till now. This is my answer and has been part of my campaign slogan as SmithieForPresident in the coal producing states in America.


If in doubt about this claim, then I’ll use the empirical and normative political ethics to explain further.

Remember the term “seeing is believing”, IMHO, it is the best way to start talking about the meaning of empirical. Subject(s) and opinion(s) backed up with tangible facts. Tactile facts, in case you are dealing with a blind person. What you say and how you say it or present it is what makes you different from a trickster, a charlatan, a buffoon or a magician.

Now, empirical in a millennial setting, means one might be dealing with sensation, context plus a wide array of localized, multi-cultural and professional contents. If this is the case, then I guess the best way to talk about anything empirical is to use nature of content (subjective or non-subjective) to identify and analyse it as a subject of particular discuss.

Art is art. Do not use psychology to validate it’s meaning as art. Same as in business. Do not use sociology to explain away why a business is loosing customers – if the problem is software related. Do not use something strange to subject or “content sensitivity” to explain a kidney failure – if you’ve spent an entire life using shots of whiskey to wash down 2000 milligrams of medical prescriptions.

In mature politics and not Trump-like politics, something called empirical ethics is a logical step and a rational tool that a third party presidential candidate like myself use as a way to avoid tawdry, ill-chosen, misguided and pure “normative” garbs – to criticize either Trump or Clinton.

Note, i use the word normative here, because normative is something that is mostly concerned with notions, or let’s say our concerns and conceptions. This are perceptual “actions” and expectations about what ought to be or what is morally wrong to do, or what should be the right thing to do.

For example, I always refer people i meet on my campaign trips (mostly American voters) to certain sections of the Bible, if and when they ask me about Trump. Rather than quote, i’d say, “please read up on:

  • 1 Timothy 3:1–4
  • Titus 1:5–7
  • Job 34:29–30

to understand the Bible’s guide for selecting a leader in a democracy. It applies to Christians and non-Christians. And it perfectly describe Trump.

Now, this is me as a presidential candidate using the Biblical facts as an empirical reference to prove the normative – a belief in the Bible and bringing it’s content into the present.


Reason is: problem with the normative (ethics) is, it is highly influenced by folk thinking, pass-down beliefs, locality and generally the inherent character of human beings. That is why decision making based on just the normative alone, breed disagreements. As it always come off worse to the majority – if it does not address situation properly.

  • This is common with work related issues.
  • Pay grade issues between men and women at work in Hollywood is an example.
  • The current toilet use for transgender and other LGBT issues coming up today are examples.

Hillary Clinton and her performance as a public office holder for the past twenty five years comes to play here. I have been using two weapons so far.

  • First is, “She’s been in office for a far longer period than the founding fathers, but has actually done less to help women” is what i have been telling American voters. But these sentence alone is normative. So to back up my claim or claims, I pick on her personal approach and attitude to the ethics of care as the empirical or the invariable.
  • For a public official, this is an aspect the duty of care for your subjects – the American public. In Hillary’s case, she’s lived so long under the preference of thriving and carving out a career in a man’s world – with laws, regulations, healthcare and tax rules made from a man’s view of the world, to the point that she’s no longer interdependent. That is why she comes across as devoid of empathy and compassion.
  • Look at her debates. Look at her records as a civil servant, a First Lady in charge of healthcare and education in Arkansas. Look at the type of candidates she selected for several positions when Bill Clinton was in office. Then her lack luster performance as a New York state Senator for two terms, before becoming the Secretary of State.
  • But to those that are old enough and well versed in American history and the Constitution, I refer them to what the American revolution was all about, and other facts as given in the Constitution.

This is me using both empirical and normative ethics for my campaign. It is my way of allowing homegrown (domestic) American issues and concern, to inform the national and the form of foreign concerns.

It has worked for me as a candidate setting up a third party in America. It has separated me from tawdry ravings and rantings of other candidates. And has put me above Trumps “boogie shoe” politics.


This is how i see the empirical and the normative as a presidential candidate and as a politician. This is how it affects me as at now. If you ask me the same question on a professional level as an artist, a soldier, a nihilist, a script writer, a film maker, a poet or as a tech enthusiast, I most certainly will put forward different views and anchor my empirical reasoning(s) differently.

The different between both is in the fact that the normative alone allows a wide room for error. It is based on belief and it is worse than drug because it never leaves you. And like Daniel’s dream in the Bible, it remains ingrained in your ego, your intellectualism and your decision making in life. it is even worse if you are a public official with a role. No matter what, your preference and your pragmatic decisions will always be lop-sided and impartial.

Whereas the empirical is based on facts and hard evidence.

  • American energy produces 32 percent of American energy use and jobs for communities before Independence. Switching to an untested alternative overnight, without investing in human resources that will help communal transformation to other millennial professions is not a preferable option. Communities would loose their livelihood.

The normative here is coal. The empirical here is the other sides argument that:

  • it is hazardous to miners health and because of dangerous mining techniques.
  • it is dangerous to the environment – to farm lands and to the atmosphere.

But the alternatives and smart energy options given – observed under the same empirical light, are all more dangerous and far more combustible to men, women, animals, land and to the atmosphere in general than coal has ever been in almost three hundred years or more.

And that is where i come in with transitional program as a third party candidate, since others are all into fashionable and pragmatic solutions that will lead to huge amount of job losses. So, my descriptive but normative campaign slogan here has been in reaching out to concerned coal states and saying,

  • “look, Trump and Hillary Clinton are not only out to take jobs and food off your table, they are New Yorkers’ and are simply out to take banjo and blues off your American hands as well.”

This statement is true because it is backed up with empirical facts – based on campaign statements, not attitudes. Fact is:

  • what defines an American more than the banjo and blues?


Another example of normative is myth. That we have the best military equipment in the world, is normative, because facts in Ukraine, Syria and our electronic and early warning stations in the middle east and the Gulf proofed otherwise. The last part of the sentence is empirical. It becomes even more so when you add key circumstantial facts that:

  • our tanks and our infantry fighting vehicles were all conceived before Reagan, but built during Reagan.
  • Same as our light arms.
  • Our defensive missiles (for homeland America) are out of date, except the ones tested against North Korean kerosene, salt and phosphate powered missiles in Yemen by the Saudis’ and the Israeli’s.
  • Meanwhile Putin just managed to fire missiles into Syria, then followed it with about fifty bombers – to and fro. And all went through our electronic warning and defense sites covering Turkey, the Middle east and the Arabian Gulf. That is about ten miles of hot burning metal in the atmosphere.

This is another of my key campaign’s “empirical” fact. And it is the major force behind my urgent call for infrastructure update and the need to ReBuildUSAtoday and our military.

This is how this query touched me as at now and I hope i have answered your question as a campaigning politician and presidential candidate.


NRA and Gun Issue

Gun issue requires good insight, level headedness, clear thinking and not tawdry politics. But if the NRA leadership choose the tawdry path – as they seem to be doing now – with Trump, then they are definitely setting up gun owners (Veterans and their members all over the country) on a troublesome path with the law.


The thing is, as a presidential candidate, I see guns and its ownership as something culturally American. And if we all agree to take necessary precautions, our right to bear firearms will never be taken away or threatened in any way.

But if we agree to go along with someone that thinks the only way to protect our kids on primary and secondary school premises, is to allow firearms (carried by teachers) inside classrooms, on school playgrounds and around school perimeter, without providing details, then we are setting ourselves up for a problem. And guess what! It will be bigger than what the Israeli’s face everyday.


These are our kids. Next generation Americans. We can protect them better by adopting, the School Defense and Access Plan. This is an all-American plan. It was developed by the US Marine Embassy Guards, in the 1930’s. And is still in use by all U.S. Embassy Schools abroad. Setting this up across the homeland is tax payers money well spent at home. It is far better than propping up a base abroad.

With this in mind, what I will have in every primary and secondary school is a SAP and a DP. A well prepared DP (defensive perimeter) with an SAP (single access point) can hold off an entire platoon of well trained professional infantry for quite a while.

Also, we cannot afford to expose teachers to the uncontrolled rage of students with bad grades at this level.


As for college campuses, it is filled with military age adults. Now these groups (U.S. Citizens only) if given three weeks training with special focus on weapon handling techniques, buddy buddy orientation, and then organized into small groups. They are certainly going to come out being capable of defending themselves before an 2RF (rapid reaction force) arrives on scene.

Now, if upon graduation anyone (U.S. Citizen) with this training decides to seek his or her fortune abroad by joining a foreign military or militia – ally country or not, he or she will automatically loose citizenship, passport and be declared a enemy of state.

This is how I plan to address school safety and gun issue across the U.S. if elected president.  As for our shopping malls and other public places, I have other plans in place. Just remember we are a country with almost 26 million Veterans, and none would hesitate at the chance to defend the homeland.


Asian Americans

To Asian Americans and Pacific Island Americans:

I care about the silent majority amongst us.  I honor your continuous strife at labor, employment, economic security and your determination to make better the productive life of women.


Please do join me SmithieForPresident at the Pilgrims Alliance party of America, and let us use the richness and the dept of our diversity as our strength to ReBuildUSAtoday with.



Mexicans, Latinos and Immigration

As a presidential candidate, my view on immigration is quite simple, practically pragmatic, progressive and comprehensive in the utilitarian and millennia sense.


The simple fact that Mexicans – being of pre-Columbian descent, are an indigenous group that was once local to the south and the western part of the United States, qualifies them to be looked at as an independent group outside the Latino label.   I will therefore push for a legislation to grant them indigenous rights.


If you disagree, then look at it this way.  If we look at Alamo, as an example of an event that affected indigenous population that was local to that particular battle theater, then consider the ferocity of the push – deeper into Mexican territory, we’ll see, that rather than being allowed the option of citizenship – as was optioned to some American Indians, the local indigenous population (ancestors of these people) were forcibly displaced by the nature of war fought by the expanding Union.

So, to most Mexicans, a trip to what we called the United States today, is like a return to their ancestral land.  Therefore, it is most rational to look at these hardworking people the way we look at Cuban exiles – a group that have thrived well outside the Latino and Hispanic label.

But if we keep going Latino! Latinos! on immigration, and look at “toda Latinos” from the eyes of their political leaders – most of whom are of Spanish Galician/Catalan descent, we’ll be applying Greco-Roman standard to a set of people that have nothing in common to these two European groups.  And we’ll be denying a majority of indigenous people who were once local to the United States their natural right of return to a land that was once their ancestors.

Double jeopardy by way of war and colonization is at play here.  Why make it worse by an old immigration system that seems out of sync with the millennia?  Granting “indigenous rights” to Mexicans already in the United States and placing them outside the Latino label is something I will do as president elect.  It is the most ethical thing to do before building a wall.  And even if I have to build a border wall, it will be in the form of new urban communities and productive border settlements – as proposed and penned out in my previous post last year.


The Pharaoh’s did it to the Jewish immigrants in Egypt.  King Solomon did it for immigrants residing in his domain in the Bible.  The King of England used the same approach to address issues of legal status faced by the British Jewry – when he designated them “the King’s visitors” when the British parliament, the land Barons, the Lords and manor Lords ganged up to deny them a legal status, talk less of British citizenship.

Worse, if we look at them from Donald Trump’s public options, then we are not too far from a modern day “trail of tears”.  Sad things is, Trump’s ancestors were not here to witness “the trail of tears” the forced displacement of “Alamo” and neither was any of his ancestors here to experience the battle for independence at Fort McHenry.  He doesn’t know any better.


Marines: Answering a question about “what would happen if 8 MEU (Marine Expedition Unit) landed in Russia?” in January, 2015

Submarine layout

Nothing will happen if 8 or more MEU landed and carry out operations inside Russia.  What is needed is good admin, good paper work or good background work.  You are giving me $5b.  Here (below) is an example of how I’ll do it.  Read through to gain an insight into my plan for the army of the future, procurement, defense,research, development and combating terrorism in Asia.


$5b dollars for an MEU expedition to Russia!  Fun, I will do it as if a sitting President.  And not just that, I will look back into one of my old movie treatment sketch for Charlie Sheen, way back in 2009, borrow from it, and use part of it to do the same thing a trio of Russian policy makers did way back in 2007.


The trio: One, a forensic economist.  Second, a furniture maker.  Third, a law enforcement officer/spymaster   The forensic economist is a man known as Alexei Kudrin.  The furniture maker is Anatoliy Serydukov and the LEO/spymaster is none other than our newly invigorated friend, Vladimirovich Putin.

Serdyukov, with head full of ideas, was about settling in, into his newly appointed position in the defense ministry and he wanted to execute what he called overdue changes.  But for the changes to be actualized, he needed money – to retool the military’s sourcing, procurement, research, development, repairs, and on and on.

Kudrin’s office will only finance any retooling if it is based on three things:

– First, anything new has to be objective enough for his number crunching department to consider any kind of funding, otherwise, keep up repairs and maintain the old Soviet system for now.

– Two, the whole process has to be systematically ingrained in reality – process, production and time frame, in this case.

– Three, the proposed overhaul must be feasible to turn current Russian military crisis into an opportunity for 3R’s – rebuild, regroup and re-org.


Putin, however remained on the fence.  He knew the checks will clip the wings of his (infantry mannered) defense minister, but wanted the best out of both ex-Afghan war Soviet military officers.  So, at an informal meeting at a dacha somewhere around Sochi, he highlighted what he wanted for a Combined Russian Armed Forces – in pragmatically near Russian terms of “near now and execution” “near mid plan and execution” but no “near long-term”.

What he wanted was an organic system – something that is able to regenerate and plastic enough to evolve with time.  And guess what! He’s got the guys to do it.

So, in rather simple terms, Putin called for “Novvy Pokoleniye Sila” (“new generation force”) at the informal meeting.  Serdyukov said it could be “tailored”.  Kudrin, uptight and for ever wary of cost, proposed “funktsioniruyet teknologiya” functioning technology or “functioning prototypes”.  Please note: In the U.S., the U.K. and probably Israel, this will be regarded as disposable or first stage “technology demonstrators”.


After a few logical explanations here and there, Serydukov agreed.  Now, like Putin, sourcing out talents and fitting parts of different origins together is one of Serdyukov’s strong point.  He went to work straight away – some said with axe and hammer.  But it worked.

Within a very short span of time, Russia used his “new force generation model” to modernize its army.  Kudrin made available more credits than fluid cash.  And rather than being deterred, Serydukov used whatever credit was made available by Kudrin’s office to buy, hack, intrude, override security systems, improve and generally Russify anything and everything (land, air and sea) for Arctic warfare and beyond.  Long term contracts and commitments were based on performance and reliability of product, as well as development and research.

India, as of today, is using this prototyping technique or technology demonstrator and local credit idea for it’s space and defense program.

Benefit of “prototyping” in the defense industry as displayed by this trio is, you can employ several mid size defense industry manufacturers and energize local researchers to make different things.  And you can then field their products for a joint or combined operation – knowing they have embedded chips that will always seek each other out in whatever spectrum.  All you need is a motherboard (western thinking) but these guys created and set up a set of checkpoints – that could work independently of motherboard.


At this point I most gladly salute DD and all the nuggets and good eggs at the Duke of Yorks’ for their work, training and commitment to duty above all.  Wireless gadgets are truly “the biggest prostitute” any soldier could ever carry to a battle field.  Russians know this and they are using it to cheat (cold pack style) on the battlefield.

So, here is what I’ll do to stretch the money and make every penny count.

Since the area of op. is Russia and how far the MEU could go, I’ll immediately place a call for developing a new set of platforms and a unique set of configurations that is most suitable for a potential operational deployment.

Embark on a base restructuring, change – if not disrupt procurement procedures for MEU, for this expedition, for always and ever.

– First, reduce overhead (civilian admin) cost by firing all the top managers in Pentagon.

– Then, turn the MEU into a “tailored force” specifically for this op. and nothing else.

– Will not use any on the weapons or weapon platforms you prescribed or mentioned in the question.


Reason: IMO, they have all been compromised.  So:

– I will generate a new set of “tailored weapons” for this op.  As the only way to meet expedition imperatives is by catering for or make ready to meet complex operational environments they are most likely to face in, about and around Russia.

– I will reshape whatever base structure is in place as at now, change weapon development and procurement procedures.

Equation = I have a modern force (not contemporary, and not fashionable) but a re-furnished MEU as a total force – that is capable of spectrum domination and could very much operate without regional allies.

Like the Russian trio, my tailored force will be reliant on prototyping, albeit with special emphasis on bespoke manufacturing, custom maintenance with special attention given to those elements that could affect production, capability, availability and performance.  So, we are looking at a self sufficient force that is able to adapt and activate research technique for limited-prototyping-prod. (weapons that are made ready to go) and evo.-prototyping-prod. (new weapons that are continuously being created, developed and adapted for use) by the MEU for this purpose.

At this stage:

– I will not use any existing manufacturer.  I will have my own for the MEU.

– I will not use any existing maintenance crew.  I will have my own for the MEU.

– I will not use any outside supplier.  I will build my own MEU sourcing network.

– I will rely mostly on technology demonstrators, their programmers, scientists, machinists and designers.

– And the core of their research and development team will be mobile and offshore.

– Size of the MEU is too small, so I’ll impress the Forward Assault Element of the British Army and the Royal Marines into the MEU.

– Since I don’t want to include any Marshall Plan again, I will not fight from anywhere in Europe.  Impact of Russian fall back will be too great on hosting European countries.

– I will not approach Russia from the Arctic either.  Too risky.  Too costly and better protected than Russia’s western front.

But since I can’t lure Russia out of its comfort zone into anywhere around or below the equator, I will then resort to a ruse.

With this in mind:

– I will use this opportunity to set up a crisis (as a U.S. President) turn this crisis into an opportunity to make an air craft carrier disappear in plain sight and out of it’s battle group formation.

– Will use certain airborne borne weapons and one or two seaborne platforms developed and built by the combination of Russian and Austrian engineers and programmers to achieve deception of …… equipments and certain battle group assets, override …. and ….. then using …. technique, I will proceed with the insertion of …., this will cause a total displacement of an American air craft career and finally enable it’s disappearance, along with all able bodied personnel and all functioning equipments – on the high seas and in plain sight.

– Will have it docked at an inlet on the Easter coast of Canada, cover it with pine trees if I chose to, but will make the public believe it was hijacked by terrorists from the Caucasus, towed to NK’s Raison district, where it was diced up into pieces and shipped in bits and pieces (together with all personnels) into the Caucasus via Raison, NK, Shanghai, China, Rumen, China through Russia’s agricultural oblast and into the Caucasus.  Please note, this area alone is as huge as Canada and United States joined together.


Now, as we all know, the constitution IMO, states that anywhere the spirit of our security touches is an American territory.  I will make an announcement stating that due to the recent hijack and eventual disappearance of an American air craft carrier and all personnel and active weapons on board, I as President have therefore decided on a search, destroy and rescue mission.

But before then, I would have:

– Laid off core managers in the Pentagon, the State Department, a few Navy Admirals, then look for a really pissed up Marine Colonel (Charlie Sheen in my movie) to launch a mega SOF attack on Russia …say 200 to 1000 coordinated mission on terrorists, radar sites and certain abandoned nuclear assets inside Russia, China’s trading port of Shanghai, North Korea’s trading port, freedom bridge and Siberia railway network all at once for three days.

– I will immediately extract and whilst doing so, I will engage the Russians on the reason for the mega op.  Reason is, I don’t want to start a precedence that we might not be able to control – should Russia decide to hit back.

– I will then use the “prototyping and self sustainment” MEU experience to rebuild the a new Combined U.S. Armed Forces Group once this is over.

Marines MEU will lead the way, just as the Russian policy makers pulled Russian (airborne) Armed Forces out of Soviet shadows.

There are many more work to be done, especially when it comes to operations, logistics and execution.   But this is the basis upon which all will be set up.

As to hijacking and making the air craft carrier disappear, so sorry I can’t name or mention the equipments and the techniques.  The needed equipments are so simple, you could put them together in Home Depot.


Homeland security

Homeland Security

As a 2016 Presidential candidate, I will update current capabilities of certain agencies throughout the United States.  Reduce current logistical footprints so they could be mobile, flexible and responsive enough to “apprehensively” deal with non-conventional operations.

I’d rather not go by the grain and do what the government and every security expert is promoting, which is: dive, hide, run – if unlucky enough to be in an area during a terrorist attack.

No matter how, this individualistic approach to freedom/self defense will not address the problem we are faced with today and neither will it solve the problem by an inch. It is a way of shifting responsibility. And this is not my approach to security matters, and as a Presidential candidate and a “military egg” I see what is unraveling differently then most people do. Guess what! I’ve seen how the British dealt with the PROVO and I’d rather tackle it now.
– certain areas within the FBI, ICE and others need to plugged, updated.
– certain areas within these agencies need to be mobile and made more responsive.
– certain areas writhing these agencies need to be made ready and flexible enough to face and deal with the variety of things/attacks/terrorism/cyber threats before they happen or as they happen.


The only way to make this happen is to either reduce/redirect current logistic footprint. This way a related agency will not only be well prepared, but properly rigged to deal with conventional operations and non-conventional operations as they happen.

There are equipments (new technologies) for the kind of fast response and update that I am proposing. We just need to have them in place. Guess what! They are non-invasive – unless one is bent on going out to commit a crime. It is possible to apprehend criminals/terrorists before they get to scene of crime.

Also, the kind of (first contact alert) technologies I plan to deploy all over the U.S. are environmentally friendly. The only thing is, once the ping/alert sign goes off, it demands a @michaelteague “fire fighters’ response” of Police officers’ or of any responding agency.

There are other things to do ASAP.  What I will not do is put general public at risk by being as abusive as #Trump.  Targeting and labeling #MuslimsInTheUS is #Unpatriotic  It is #AntiAmerican. #DonaldTrump is simply putting our #AmericanSecurity at risk.


EMP attack

How to protect Americans from an EMP attack



Points to note Mr. Obama.

Mr. President, if I find myself in a position to protect Americans from Electro Magnetic Pulse attack, I will not wait for security experts to find strength, severity of pulse, direction, source and location of an attack, ‘specially if it is most likely to come from North Korea.

As the most qualified Presidential Candidate for this coming election, 2016, my guide against an EMP attack will be to shore up facilities in all cities.  After which I will encourage city and urban planners to research and rethink the make up and the layout of cities and small communities all over the United States.

What I’d love to see developed could be summed up as:

– Surge, heat and thermal radiation resistant housing for building, appliances and gadgets.

– New methods of insulation for certain public and private appliances and materials.

– Will encourage a robust study of material technology in schools, local clubs and hobby shops.

– Let the specialists research and develop an aerial vacuum-energy insulation device, a sub-surface micro wave energy sucking device or a thermal energy converter.

– A military equipment overhaul and personnel upgrade is most certainly a must.  We are vulnerable and our Intel sucks.

But for now, trailer parks, trailer houses and the group known as “trailer trash” are most protected from EMP attack.  Majority of Americans are doomed.  And since most people would frown upon living in double wide trailers, then, I see it as imperative to introduce new things like styrofoam and cardboards elements into roofs, buildings, basements and stilt structures.


Also, earthen rods, to different parts of building structures, could be inserted all the way to underground water beds and made to point away from building structures at surface level.

Smart gadgets, fire-pots and SUB cable points are the weakest to to protect.  And since it will be too hard to implement a law that will reduce the amount of electronic/computerized chips embedded in fire walls and most operating systems, I’d suggest a specially designed low energy caging system.  Or maybe a gel-energy (dissipating or casing) shell.

One thing to consider is that what applies in the South, the Gulf coast states and an Equatorial state like Florida, might not solve the same problem for those in the middle region, and neither will these degree of measures be adequate for those states in the North.  Alaska, being in the polar region will require a different set of measures as well.

Same applies to military technology – starting with the THAAD and how we deploy it in and around Asia.  The nature of that area is not like the Middle East or the plains of Eastern Europe.  No.  It calls for a need to develop mobile and independently powered THAAD platforms.

The nature of that terrain also calls for a strong guide against false reflection and clutter.  Comprehensive equipment re-design, structural overhaul and form adjustment could be put in place to avoid degrading of missile radar and equipment – as North Koreans are poised to do now.

Join me at ReBuildUSAtoday.




I see both universal healthcare and medicare as universally sexist. It favored #Men and #MEN more than it does #Women. And this is because it was formulated, drafted and came to being at a time when 98% or more of the #workforce were MEN.  If so, then: Isn’t it time we look at it again? Isn’t it ripe for a revision, if not a total overhaul?

Why do #Americans assume it would it be wrong to fashion a healthcare system that take issues affecting #Women/#Girls of all ages seriously than has ever been?

Women pay a lot more for #healthcare and #insurance #costs #today, than Men.

Fact that our “#Wall #Street” minded managers believe that Women are most likely prone to have a #short #career. And they are most likely the ones to create a gap in contribution by juggling career with raising a #family, does not mean we should keep an old system in place.

Let’s #ReBuildUSAtoday.



XI – #Farms and #water #farming
Been #Campaigning about #Drinking #Water #Water #Farming #Water #Treatment for a year and a half now. The quality of water that comes out of most #Taps across #America, it’s neglect, and the way it’s being treated is abysmal. And as I’ve always said, “this is one more reason to call for an infrastructure upgrade in the U.S., and the first step to take if I have to #RebuildUSAtoday.”

Fact is: most of our #Cities and #Urban areas are still running on World War I #DrinkingWater networks. So, should we be surprised to hear that #WhatComesOutOfOurTaps today is bad? Yes. Should we be concerned? Yes. Why? Because our tap water today, pose health risks to everyone one of us. Not just people that are poor, or those who have problem(s) with their immune system. No.

And guess who is most susceptible to rustic #pipe borne contaminants!

#Women, #Pregnant women and the next generation of #Kids – born and unborn. The elderly, the aged – our #retirees. #HillaryClinton is not talking about this #WomenIssue. Neither is #BernieSanders #Trump #TedCruz #JebBush and the rest. Reason, they are all sponsored by bottled water companies in #WaterCrisis cities like:

#Albuquerque #Atlanta #Chicago #Detroit #Houston #LosAngeles #NewOrleans #Newark #Philadelphia #Phoenix #SanDiego #WashingtonD.C. #Baltimore #Fresno #Denver #Manchester #Seattle.

As a #Presidential #Candidate for #Election2016, I will embark on modernizing #American water systems, and I will offer mandatory protection of all drinking water sources in the U.S.

#Americans, be informed and get involved. It’s time to stop drinking water from getting worse.


#Water #Climate and #Environmental issues


My view of how to build a lasting economy for the millennium is pretty straight forward. The domestic (homeland) source(s) – SMALL BUSINESS is, and has always been our economic and production backbone.  So, let us legislate to remove unnecessary regulations brought on us by outside market forces and by big data corporations.  Let the domestic production power and it’s adaptive ingenuity inform the foreign, rather than allowing the interest of the foreign and the big data to influence how, when, where and what to produce, what to sell and what not to ever produce.

Let the new age of American energy independently talk for itself without abandoning our 32% use of clean coal energy.

Rather than throw it all behind big corporations, my Presidency is the type that favors small businesses to create more jobs in the next ten years.  And I will create a domestic platform to make this possible.  I will empower them by transitional means, rather than start something fashionable like “the war on coal”  I an for legislation and rational discourse rather than public politics.  Because logical legislation, not regulation, allows us to harness the power of key facilitators of modern economy.

For example technology, brick and mortal companies – through digitalization and automation are known key drivers of efficiency.  They create small independent jobs.  I’ll focus on investing in a new type of credit and human resources needed for these industries to thrive in farming and coal producing states like Kentucky, Wyoming, West Virginia, South Carolina and a few other states.

With new credit and friendly but transitional legislation for services and supply, I propose a strong focus on small businesses – the private sector, as a way to energize the production side of our economy.  Energy sector is key to our growth as an economic power.  Coal or not, I will not abandon what we have now for risky and less tested alternative energy.  But will be open to infrastructure update – so long as it informs the new age of American energy independence and rational transition rather than fashionable options.


Our farmers are getting old and new technology, mining in some areas, underground water table pollution and the burden of tax is making it difficult to attract young Americans to take up this productive lifestyle.  I will address this squarely.  Bring farmers and the farming community into the modern, and out of world war way of doing things.

#Income disparity, social #welfare, small government is another key factor.
In my book, addressing income disparity and minimum wage on the local American turf, is another form of shrinking federal government participation in our lives. It is not acid in the face of employers and the contracted as most assumed it to be. No. It is butter for employers, and cheese cake for employees and the contracted – if we adjust certain employment specifics, modern educational needs and update our technical capacity, invest in human resources and build more public and affordable housing in our big cities.

Otherwise, it is worthless calling for small government, if we can’t see it as a way of shedding responsibility.  It is pointless raising wages all over the country if we cant see that employers (small business owners) in the big cities – with the most high standard of living are the most affected by this trend.  It is pointless if we can’t see the how raising minimum wage alone could force more jobs overseas.  It is pointless if we cant see how good we are at killing off the same middle class that we profess to be helping to survive.

As president, i will legislate and enable a suitable act that will stem the sudden impact of minimum wage raise on employers and employees.  I will make available relocation credits to small businesses that might want to relocate to small towns, less expensive cities and other business friendly states.

Because, if the average American earn more, it means he/she will no longer have to be reliant on welfare checks, income support or even social security benefits to make ends meet. He or She might as well join a mandatory healthcare program for all, and relieve employers from taking up that burden. It is a way to keep down a sales tax increase and inflation.

Reality at the end of day is, a can of ice tea cost more than gas to tank nowadays, meaning, the average American monthly savings has improved. So rather than spend it all on kitchen improvement, garage extension, the next car in the front yard, or recapturing missed holidays, my type of President is one that will encourage family oriented savings, mandatory investment in public infrastructures through floating city and state bonds, encourage an upsurge in public/community privatization, create schools for material technology and encourage skill based hobbies for all.

This is one way of increasing the percentage of sales that goes into each community before the state.

On the international front, I will grow the American economy through trade, development and socio-cultural interaction. Rather than militarize our Police force on one hand and then deny proper training on the other hand, I’d rather boost Asia-pivot with a long term lend-lease agreement with countries that feel threatened by Russo-Chinese and Vietnam expansion into the Pacific theater. Not only is this a bigger every threat to their security as nations in South Asia, it is also a bigger to every living American. In fact, much bigger, much capable and very technical than anything we’ve ever had to deal with.

These done, I guarantee the average American will be on tract to becoming more and more equipped for the future than we are as at now. It in in my best interest to make sure the average American have better independent options.

I have other ways to boost the economy and make life a lot better for Americans.


Show Buttons
Hide Buttons